Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Exp Med ; 24(1): 77, 2024 Apr 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38630321

RESUMO

Transient or persistent immunosuppression is a known risk factor for morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Aim of the present study is to evaluate the lymphopenia in patients admitted to the Emergency Unit of AOU Policlinico Umberto I, to investigate its prevalence at admission and the persistence during hospitalization until discharge. Possible correlations were evaluated between lymphopenia, diagnosis of admission, comorbidities and chronic treatments. In this study, 240 patients (142 men; 98 female; mean age 75.1 ± 15.1) were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups according to the lymphocytes count at hospital admission, namely "Group A" with lymphopenia and "Group B" with values in the normal range. Moreover, the patients in group A were distinguished in relation to the regression or persistence of the lymphopenia assessed at the time of hospital discharge (Group A1: persistence; Group A2: normalization). Prevalence of lymphopenia at admission was 57%; Group A showed higher mean age and percentage of patients over 65 years of age; and none differences were observed regarding gender. Prevalence of lymphopenia at admission was 57%; Group A showed higher mean age and percentage of patients over 65 years of age; no differences were observed regarding gender. All subsets of the lymphocytes (CD4+, CD8+, NK) were equally reduced. Persistent lymphopenia was found in 19% of patients. Lymphopenia should be valued at the time of hospital admission as a factor influencing the prognosis, the management and the treatment of these patients.


Assuntos
Linfopenia , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Linfopenia/epidemiologia , Alta do Paciente , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Fatores de Risco
2.
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol ; 24(1): 37-43, 2024 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37962877

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to summarize the current best knowledge on the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination in vulnerable patients affected by primary antibody deficiencies (PADs), both in patients previously infected and vaccine-immunized, focusing also on the durability, on the need for multiple booster doses and on the safety of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. RECENT FINDINGS: Patients vaccinated for SARS-CoV2 have variable humoral response, still showing a tendency towards an increase in antibody titers, with factors such as booster doses, previous infections, age and specific genetic mutations influencing the outcome. Long-lasting cellular responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination instead, mostly of the T-cell type, have been observed. Overall, the duration of protection given by vaccinations is sufficient and increased upon further simulations. Furthermore, the safety profile in PID patients is excellent, with most adverse events being transient and mild and no major adverse event reported. SUMMARY: Several studies have emphasized the benefit of vaccinating patients with PADs against the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the necessity of administering booster doses. This review, by gathering the most recent and significant data from the scientific literature, could be helpful in clinical practice in the management of disease prevention in patients affected by primary immunodeficiency and also serve as inspiration for further in-depth clinical research.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Doenças da Imunodeficiência Primária , Humanos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , Imunidade , RNA Viral , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...